<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Medical Device Regulatory Briefing: Executive Briefing]]></title><description><![CDATA[Executive Briefings provides high-signal regulatory and commercialization intelligence in five minutes or less. Designed for executives who need clarity — not commentary.]]></description><link>https://leanraqa.substack.com/s/executive-briefing</link><generator>Substack</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 08:17:14 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://leanraqa.substack.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><copyright><![CDATA[leanRAQA]]></copyright><language><![CDATA[en]]></language><webMaster><![CDATA[leanraqa@substack.com]]></webMaster><itunes:owner><itunes:email><![CDATA[leanraqa@substack.com]]></itunes:email><itunes:name><![CDATA[leanRAQA]]></itunes:name></itunes:owner><itunes:author><![CDATA[leanRAQA]]></itunes:author><googleplay:owner><![CDATA[leanraqa@substack.com]]></googleplay:owner><googleplay:email><![CDATA[leanraqa@substack.com]]></googleplay:email><googleplay:author><![CDATA[leanRAQA]]></googleplay:author><itunes:block><![CDATA[Yes]]></itunes:block><item><title><![CDATA[Inside FDA’s Strange New Operating Environment]]></title><description><![CDATA[The Agency Isn&#8217;t Slowing Down. It&#8217;s Changing Shape]]></description><link>https://leanraqa.substack.com/p/inside-fdas-strange-new-operating</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://leanraqa.substack.com/p/inside-fdas-strange-new-operating</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[leanRAQA]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 13:43:49 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/197239569/6c8465eea7daf78d8f24818f8e0b3a2e.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the last year, I&#8217;ve had more conversations that start with some version of: <em>&#8220;What is FDA actually doing right now?&#8221;</em></p><p>The answer is complicated.</p><p>The agency is still reviewing submissions. Still clearing devices. Still conducting inspections. But many of the traditional mechanisms industry relies on to understand FDA&#8217;s thinking&#8212;guidance updates, public communication, interpretive clarity&#8212;have become noticeably less stable.</p><p>In this clip from a recent webinar discussion, we talk through what that looks like in practice:</p><ul><li><p>de novos with placeholder regulations,</p></li><li><p>AI-assisted review tools like ELSA,</p></li><li><p>delayed guidance modernization,</p></li><li><p>QMSR implementation pressures,</p></li><li><p>and the growing need for companies to interpret FDA behavior in real time rather than rely solely on published documentation.</p></li></ul><p>There&#8217;s also a broader question underneath all of this: what happens when regulatory systems continue functioning operationally while becoming less transparent interpretively?</p><p>That&#8217;s where things start getting interesting.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[FDA Clearance Doesn’t Mean You Have a Business]]></title><description><![CDATA[Bridging the critical gap between regulatory success and commercial reality.]]></description><link>https://leanraqa.substack.com/p/fda-clearance-doesnt-mean-you-have</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://leanraqa.substack.com/p/fda-clearance-doesnt-mean-you-have</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[leanRAQA]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 17:14:18 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/196565886/06a8a4d505cbbf4b8998f802e3cd4046.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a moment I see all the time in medtech: a company reaches FDA clearance&#8212;and assumes the hard part is over.</p><p>It&#8217;s not.</p><p>In many cases, that&#8217;s where the real challenges begin.</p><p>FDA gives you permission to market your device. It does <em>not</em> give anyone a reason to buy it&#8212;or pay for it. And that&#8217;s where launches stall.</p><p>Regulatory and reimbursement are often treated as separate steps: first approval, then payment. But they answer very different questions. The FDA is focused on safety and efficacy. Payers are focused on outcomes and economic value. One does not guarantee the other.</p><p>By the time companies start thinking seriously about reimbursement, it&#8217;s often too late. Clinical endpoints are already set, studies are complete, and the evidence gaps are locked in. At that point, you&#8217;re not building strategy&#8212;you&#8217;re fixing it. And that&#8217;s always more expensive.</p><p>Investors have learned this the hard way. Clearance alone isn&#8217;t enough. They want to understand how the device will be reimbursed, whether providers will adopt it, and whether there&#8217;s a real economic case behind it. Because a cleared device that doesn&#8217;t get used isn&#8217;t a business.</p><p>The companies that succeed don&#8217;t treat regulatory, reimbursement, and commercialization as separate workstreams. They align them early, making deliberate decisions about clinical strategy, indications, and evidence with both approval and payment in mind.</p><p>FDA clearance isn&#8217;t the finish line. It&#8217;s where commercial reality begins.</p><p></p><p></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why Some “Low-Risk” MedTech Devices Take 15 Years to Succeed]]></title><description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s not about risk class. It&#8217;s about whether the market already understands the problem&#8212;and the solution.]]></description><link>https://leanraqa.substack.com/p/why-some-low-risk-medtech-devices</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://leanraqa.substack.com/p/why-some-low-risk-medtech-devices</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[leanRAQA]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 13:56:43 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/194518455/1aa5b53ff33e46dc7594f6906ff8b447.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the most expensive mistakes in medtech isn&#8217;t regulatory&#8212;it&#8217;s misjudging how long commercialization will take.</p><p>In this clip, leanRAQA&#8217;s Renae Franz breaks down a simple but underused framework that separates fast-moving products from decade-long slogs:</p><blockquote><p>&#8220;If the commercialization is done right, it&#8217;s usually one to two years.&#8221;</p></blockquote><p>That only applies when the market already understands both the problem and the solution.</p><p>From there, timelines expand quickly:</p><ul><li><p>Known problem + unknown solution &#8594; <strong>3&#8211;5 years</strong></p></li><li><p>Unknown problem + unknown solution &#8594; <strong>10+ years</strong>, even for low-risk devices</p></li></ul><p>The example is hard to ignore:<br>A nasogastric tube placement issue&#8212;impacting ~30% of cases&#8212;took over a decade to move from awareness to adoption, despite being clinically critical.</p><blockquote><p>&#8220;This device&#8230; took till 2021 to really get market traction.&#8221;</p></blockquote><p>The takeaway isn&#8217;t theoretical:<br>Most founders&#8212;and many investors&#8212;underestimate commercialization timelines because they assume adoption behaves like approval.</p><p>It doesn&#8217;t.<br><br>Catch the full presentation here: <a href="https://youtu.be/Y_QojHiu4dQ">https://youtu.be/Y_QojHiu4dQ</a></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why Most Medical Device Claims Fail ]]></title><description><![CDATA[(And No One Notices Until It&#8217;s Too Late)]]></description><link>https://leanraqa.substack.com/p/why-most-medical-device-claims-fail</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://leanraqa.substack.com/p/why-most-medical-device-claims-fail</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[leanRAQA]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 13:29:01 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/192609875/dfe417466efbc869190f90c872c89c9d.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most medical device companies don&#8217;t get into trouble because they lie.</p><p>They get into trouble because they drift.</p><p>In this Executive Briefing, we break down a pattern that shows up repeatedly in FDA warning letters:</p><ul><li><p>Teams treat websites and marketing as separate from labeling</p></li><li><p>Claims evolve over time without being checked against original clearance</p></li><li><p>&#8220;Technically true&#8221; statements create misleading impressions</p></li><li><p>Small wording changes quietly alter intended use&#8212;and regulatory classification</p></li></ul><p>Drawing directly from real enforcement examples, this session walks through how claims move from harmless to high-risk&#8212;and why leadership teams often don&#8217;t see it happening.<br><br>You can catch the full presentation here: <a href="https://youtu.be/TAzdwZ6n_LE">https://youtu.be/TAzdwZ6n_LE</a></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Clinical Burden Doesn’t Kill Deals. Uncertainty Does.]]></title><description><![CDATA[Regulatory Reality and Investor Confidence]]></description><link>https://leanraqa.substack.com/p/clinical-burden-doesnt-kill-deals</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://leanraqa.substack.com/p/clinical-burden-doesnt-kill-deals</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[leanRAQA]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 15:02:48 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/189658802/af643500af95980587f8dd70f6738dd6.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a common concern in medtech fundraising: does the cost and complexity of clinical and regulatory work scare investors away? Sophisticated investors aren&#8217;t deterred by a <em>de novo </em>timeline or a large clinical budget&#8212;they&#8217;re deterred by uncertainty around pathway, timing, and total capital required. This conversation also explores how investor background shapes expectations and what it takes to reset strategically if a partnership or acquisition path stalls.<br><br>Catch the full conversation here: <a href="https://youtu.be/9mSkFlpfgxY">https://youtu.be/9mSkFlpfgxY</a></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[WHOOP, “Inherent Use,” and the Regulatory Inflection Point]]></title><description><![CDATA[How FDA interprets intended use &#8212; and how policy can evolve in real time.]]></description><link>https://leanraqa.substack.com/p/whoop-inherent-use-and-the-regulatory</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://leanraqa.substack.com/p/whoop-inherent-use-and-the-regulatory</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[leanRAQA]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 21:32:31 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/189068259/26ceca70d6b74ca58ee074b3f37bb6a2.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WHOOP called it general wellness. FDA called it medical.</p><p>This clip examines the warning letter, Apple&#8217;s parallel 510(k) clearance, and the broader implications of &#8220;inherent use&#8221; in digital health.</p><p>The takeaway isn&#8217;t outrage. It&#8217;s evolution.</p><p>Watch the full video here: <a href="https://youtu.be/ERr9Yml-7HQ">https://youtu.be/ERr9Yml-7HQ</a></p>]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>